March Madness 2008 Printable Bracket

March Madness 2008 Printable Bracket
It’s that time again….March Madness and every office with any semblance of life will be incorporating March Madness 2008 office pools.Needless-to-say, all our readers will require a printable bracket. These can be found at either ESPN.com or CBS Sportsline.
Just how popular are office pools and contests?
The tournament is no longer the exclusive province of the sports-obsessed. Office pools have dramatically expanded the number participating in and obsessing about the tourney. Last year, more than 3 million participated in online tournament contests, and with each year, more and more women enter office pools. Many — men and women alike — are simply ill-equipped to handle the pressure.
"Given the levels of unremitting stress, is it any wonder that thousands of Americans experience degrees of mental dysfunction during and long after the three-week event?" asked Dr. Frederick Geisel, a renowned industrial psychologist. "Effects can range from minor and temporary emotional imbalance to more prolonged periods of melancholy — or, its opposite, bouts of seemingly unprovoked rage — to longer-term effects, such as acute clinical depression."

read_more

Tags: bracket, ncaa, printable

10 Responses to “March Madness 2008 Printable Bracket”

on 17 Mar 2008 at 10:37 am Raven

Yup. This is why I like scripting languages (the fast develop->test cycle).Sure, I could stare at my code for a minute after each change and be reasonably sure that there are no errors in it, or I could hit the run hotkey and the computer will do that for me in a tenth of a second.
on 17 Mar 2008 at 11:27 am Reannon

Programming is hard to learn. Ignoring that, I don’t see how Haskell is different from any other language out there.
on 17 Mar 2008 at 12:18 pm Gillian

Well, I do this for code I just wrote, so if I can’t understand it I have bigger problems than whether I manually or automatically check typos.I think you misunderstood what I meant. I don’t use the quick develop->test cycle to replace all debugging, just the simple stuff (missing semicolons or other syntax, typo’d variable names, missing methods). That means that rather than spend my time staring at the code debugging both hard (logic problems) and easy (typos) bugs, I only have to spend it on the hard bugs. The simple stuff is taken care of for me when I run the program.
on 17 Mar 2008 at 1:08 pm Rowley

This dino is using the wrong language
on 17 Mar 2008 at 1:59 pm Kian

Your keyboard is full of fail. You can see it welling up through the holes where normal keyboards have shift keys.
on 17 Mar 2008 at 2:49 pm Marylu

Nicer solution:Use Haskell.
on 17 Mar 2008 at 3:40 pm Sloane

http://www.qwantz.com/archive/001170.htmlI lol’d
on 17 Mar 2008 at 4:31 pm Shaylyn

Unfortunately, the previous day’s wasn’t so funny.
on 17 Mar 2008 at 5:21 pm Tyson

Some of us are thrilled when compiler tells us that we’re missing a semicolon as opposed to pointing at a barely relevant piece of code 5 include files later…

on 17 Mar 2008 at 10:37 am Raven

Yup. This is why I like scripting languages (the fast develop->test cycle).Sure, I could stare at my code for a minute after each change and be reasonably sure that there are no errors in it, or I could hit the run hotkey and the computer will do that for me in a tenth of a second.

on 17 Mar 2008 at 11:27 am Reannon

Programming is hard to learn. Ignoring that, I don’t see how Haskell is different from any other language out there.

on 17 Mar 2008 at 12:18 pm Gillian

Well, I do this for code I just wrote, so if I can’t understand it I have bigger problems than whether I manually or automatically check typos.I think you misunderstood what I meant. I don’t use the quick develop->test cycle to replace all debugging, just the simple stuff (missing semicolons or other syntax, typo’d variable names, missing methods). That means that rather than spend my time staring at the code debugging both hard (logic problems) and easy (typos) bugs, I only have to spend it on the hard bugs. The simple stuff is taken care of for me when I run the program.

on 17 Mar 2008 at 1:08 pm Rowley

This dino is using the wrong language

on 17 Mar 2008 at 1:59 pm Kian

Your keyboard is full of fail. You can see it welling up through the holes where normal keyboards have shift keys.

on 17 Mar 2008 at 2:49 pm Marylu

Nicer solution:Use Haskell.

on 17 Mar 2008 at 3:40 pm Sloane

http://www.qwantz.com/archive/001170.htmlI lol’d

on 17 Mar 2008 at 4:31 pm Shaylyn

Unfortunately, the previous day’s wasn’t so funny.

on 17 Mar 2008 at 5:21 pm Tyson

Some of us are thrilled when compiler tells us that we’re missing a semicolon as opposed to pointing at a barely relevant piece of code 5 include files later…

kimblr.com