History has been kind to NCAA basketball tournament favorites
Since the tournament began seeding teams in 1979, 21 of 29 champions have been seeded No. 1 or No. 2. UCLA is listed as 7-2 favorites to win it all.
The NCAA men’s basketball tournament has a reputation for big upsets, but the key to March Madness for bettors is to support favorites when it comes to picking the eventual national champion.
Since the tournament began seeding teams in 1979, 21 of 29 champions have been seeded No. 1 or No. 2 and only three teams seeded higher than eighth have even reached the Final Four.
That’s why on most betting boards, future odds for this year’s tournament lean heavily on top-seeded teams UCLA, North Carolina, Kansas and Memphis.
The Bruins are listed as 7-2 favorites to win it all, followed by the Tar Heels at 9-2, Jayhawks at 5-1 and Tigers at 8-1, quality lines when you consider that every other team in the tournament faces double-digit odds or greater.
But there are a couple of “long-shot” teams attracting support to pull off an upset, and they are perennial powers Duke, Georgetown, Louisville and Texas.
According to Sportsbook.com’s most recent tournament line, the Blue Devils — who have reached the Final Four 10 times under Coach Mike Krzyzewski — are at 15-1, with the Hoyas and Cardinals at 12-1 and the Longhorns at 10-1.
Note: Southern California’s three other tournament teams are big-time longshots: USC is 40-1, San Diego is 400-1 and Cal State Fullerton is not listed on most boards.
For first-round games, Georgetown has gained the most support to cover its point-spread line, according to Wagerline.com’s consensus betting list.
The Hoyas, favored by 16 points over Maryland Baltimore County, have been picked by 78.25% to beat the spread against the Retrievers.
USC is another team getting strong money play, according to theSpread.com’s betting chart. The Trojans, who are favored by 2 1/2 points over Kansas State, have gained 77% of the bets against the spread as of Tuesday afternoon.
Tags: ncaa, standings
Carry over from the Ron Paul movement?Thats a bunch of ball cockery.I don’t recall any “Fuck you XYZ” coming from a Ron Paul supporter, but I may have missed one.Besides, a true Ron Paul supported wouldn’t jump ship like a little baby sucking the tit of the government.
I’ve looked into it myself, and it seems more likely that it WAS NOT a conspiracy. But, I don’t know everything, and if new evidence emerged that was credible and unbiased, suggesting that something else was going on, I would change my opinion.I downmodded you b/c you are 100% sure that you are right, that 9/11 conspiracy theories were the greatest thing since sliced bread. This is just adolescent egocentrism/foolishness.
Ditto!
Dialog?Have you seen the stories on reddit for the past few weeks? Every story about Clinton is some slanderous hit piece. Any time I point that out, I’d get modded down.Reddit is very biased and like you pointed out, many redditors are cry babies. Clinton won those states fairly, but I can without doubt expect a story on reddit either today or tomorrow claiming vote hacking or cheating that resulted in Obama losing when he should have won.
Sweet. You are welcome!
Queue the election stealing conspiracy topics, please.
Welcome to the world of humor.
WAKE UP SHEEPLE!