Television movies for the week of May 11

‘02. Hugh Grant. An irresponsible playboy becomes emotionally attached to a woman’s 12-year-old son. (PG-13) (2:00) E!: Wed. 1 P.M., Thu. 9 A.M.
‘97. Clint Eastwood. A veteran thief catches the president of the United States in adultery and a murder cover-up. (R) (2:30) TNT: Sun. 9 A.M., 2:30 A.M. (CC)
‘49. Spencer Tracy. Married lawyers clash in and out of court over a woman’s right to shoot her husband and his lover. (NR) (2:00) TCM: Mon. 1:30 P.M. (CC)
• Adventures of Kitty O’Day
‘44. Jean Parker. A telephone operator plays homicide detective with her boyfriend, making it harder for the police. (NR) (1:15) TCM: Fri. 6:45 A.M.
• The African Queen
‘51. Humphrey Bogart. An imperious woman makes a gin-soaked boat captain fight Germans in the World War I Congo. (NR) (2:00) TCM: Mon. 6 P.M. (CC)
• Agent Cody Banks
‘03. Frankie Muniz. Recruited by the CIA, a teen works under cover to befriend a girl whose father is a pawn for an evil organization. (PG) (2:00) ABCFAM: Sat. noon (CC)
• Agent Cody Banks 2: Destination London
‘04. Frankie Muniz. A 16-year-old CIA agent poses as a clarinet prodigy while trying to recover stolen mind-control software. (PG) (2:00) ABCFAM: Sat. 2 P.M. (CC)
• Air Force One
‘97. Harrison Ford. Demanding the release of a political prisoner, a terrorist and his gang hijack the U.S. president’s plane. (R) (2:30) TNT: Sun. 2 P.M. (CC)
‘94. Brendan Fraser. Attention-hungry musicians decide to grab the media spotlight by taking staffers at a popular radio station hostage. (PG-13) (1:40) STZ: Fri. 8:30 A.M. (CC)
• Akeelah and the Bee
‘06. Laurence Fishburne. Akeelah, an 11-year-old girl living in South Los Angeles, discovers she has a talent for spelling, which she hopes will take her to the National Spelling Bee. (PG) (2:00) TMC: Sun. 8:45 A.M., 6 P.M., Thu. 7 A.M., 2:50 P.M. (CC)

post-gazette.com

Tags: express, ryan, s, von

15 Responses to “Television movies for the week of May 11”

on 25 May 2008 at 7:24 am Karlene

voted up for entertaining wonkiness.
on 25 May 2008 at 8:14 am Steven

You think so? I think they are both just pandering and basically saying the same thing.
on 25 May 2008 at 9:05 am Alden

If people are paying attention this debate should change that. She is just brilliant tonight.
on 25 May 2008 at 9:55 am Roseanne

There was no side swipe.Frankly, if she wasn’t naive (which she says she wasn’t), then she voted for war.Are you a Clinton shill or just a troll?
on 25 May 2008 at 10:46 am Merry

she had a big advantage starting the campaign, given her instant brand-name recognition, but obama has been running a near-flawless campaign. his strategy has been impeccable - hit hard in must-win (very white) iowa and give credibility to your campaign, do as well as you can in NH and NV, and hammer it home in south carolina, where you have an advantage.when he ran for the senate, and blew out alan keyes, i thought it was because keyes was such a weak candidate. while keyes may have been weak, obama has a very effective political machine, and he went for the jugular. He should not be underestimated.hillary’s national advantage has been eroding since obama took IA, and he is close to even with her now. tonights debate, whether you call it a win for obama or not, showed him going toe to toe with her, and not buckling. those who haven’t seen him, and may have been doubting whether he was presidential material, tonight saw obama at least as hillary’s equal, if not superior.
on 25 May 2008 at 11:36 am Annalee

Well, she just got pounded by Obama, Blitzer, and the audience on Iraq.She’s brilliantly naive.
on 25 May 2008 at 12:27 pm Jermaine

http://knowbeforeyouvote.com/http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4418755258695733791http://www.cfr.org/bios/11603/barack_obama.htmlNotable Republicans of the CFR:Mitt Romney,Rudy Giuliani,John McCain,Dick Cheney, Barrack Obama. Reelecting CFR members, does not represent change in my book.This message was approved by RonBot 503-16-2465.
on 25 May 2008 at 1:18 pm Jackalyn

But Hill-dog has the Super-20 nailed down.
on 25 May 2008 at 2:08 pm Darian

Must be a really hush-hush conspiracy. I haven’t heard of one, and I’ve been volunteering with the campaign for months.
on 25 May 2008 at 2:59 pm Dax

That’s because your brother is an idiot.
on 25 May 2008 at 3:49 pm Baxter

This is essentially from the effective narrowing of the field, IMO, so is less dramatic than it might appear.
on 25 May 2008 at 4:40 pm Jo

I think it’ll be 11/11, and if Edwards waits until after the game (monday) to support Obama, he might win California.
on 25 May 2008 at 5:30 pm Fina

I do think so. She is particularly strong. He is falling back on blather and reaganesque tricks.
on 25 May 2008 at 6:21 pm Petunia

In a battle with the Paul spambots.

on 25 May 2008 at 7:24 am Karlene

voted up for entertaining wonkiness.

on 25 May 2008 at 8:14 am Steven

You think so? I think they are both just pandering and basically saying the same thing.

on 25 May 2008 at 9:05 am Alden

If people are paying attention this debate should change that. She is just brilliant tonight.

on 25 May 2008 at 9:55 am Roseanne

There was no side swipe.Frankly, if she wasn’t naive (which she says she wasn’t), then she voted for war.Are you a Clinton shill or just a troll?

on 25 May 2008 at 10:46 am Merry

she had a big advantage starting the campaign, given her instant brand-name recognition, but obama has been running a near-flawless campaign. his strategy has been impeccable - hit hard in must-win (very white) iowa and give credibility to your campaign, do as well as you can in NH and NV, and hammer it home in south carolina, where you have an advantage.when he ran for the senate, and blew out alan keyes, i thought it was because keyes was such a weak candidate. while keyes may have been weak, obama has a very effective political machine, and he went for the jugular. He should not be underestimated.hillary’s national advantage has been eroding since obama took IA, and he is close to even with her now. tonights debate, whether you call it a win for obama or not, showed him going toe to toe with her, and not buckling. those who haven’t seen him, and may have been doubting whether he was presidential material, tonight saw obama at least as hillary’s equal, if not superior.

on 25 May 2008 at 11:36 am Annalee

Well, she just got pounded by Obama, Blitzer, and the audience on Iraq.She’s brilliantly naive.

on 25 May 2008 at 12:27 pm Jermaine

http://knowbeforeyouvote.com/http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4418755258695733791http://www.cfr.org/bios/11603/barack_obama.htmlNotable Republicans of the CFR:Mitt Romney,Rudy Giuliani,John McCain,Dick Cheney, Barrack Obama. Reelecting CFR members, does not represent change in my book.This message was approved by RonBot 503-16-2465.

on 25 May 2008 at 1:18 pm Jackalyn

But Hill-dog has the Super-20 nailed down.

on 25 May 2008 at 2:08 pm Darian

Must be a really hush-hush conspiracy. I haven’t heard of one, and I’ve been volunteering with the campaign for months.

on 25 May 2008 at 2:59 pm Dax

That’s because your brother is an idiot.

on 25 May 2008 at 3:49 pm Baxter

This is essentially from the effective narrowing of the field, IMO, so is less dramatic than it might appear.

on 25 May 2008 at 4:40 pm Jo

I think it’ll be 11/11, and if Edwards waits until after the game (monday) to support Obama, he might win California.

on 25 May 2008 at 5:30 pm Fina

I do think so. She is particularly strong. He is falling back on blather and reaganesque tricks.

on 25 May 2008 at 6:21 pm Petunia

In a battle with the Paul spambots.

kimblr.com